Republicans have introduced a bill to prevent U.S. states from passing AI laws for a decade. The aim is to foster innovation by reducing legal barriers. But at what cost?

The fight for “objectivity” in AI always reflects a set of values. It is therefore political and varies across cultures. Meta has just entered the arena. We all remember the Google Gemini fiasco: an image generator that portrayed Black Nazi soldiers or a female pope in the 18th century. A quest for inclusivity pushed to the [...]

Is Brussels really pivoting from hyper‑regulation to tech‑friendly growth? The EU has issued more tech rules than any other jurisdiction – way more. Can you even name them all? We have GDPR, DSA, DMA, DORA, NIS 2, AI Act, DGA, e-Privacy, etc. Plus national rules on top. Regulation fatigue is peaking Criticism against this regulation [...]

The AI dilemma in regulation (balancing safety with innovation) is universal, yet each jurisdiction pursues unique solutions. China, the EU, and the U.S. each take distinct approaches to harness AI's potential while mitigating its risks. At the same time, AI ethics principles have emerged worldwide, revealing both common ground and notable differences across legal and ethical frameworks. This article examines how major jurisdictions regulate AI, the varied directions they take, and the underlying rationales driving their approaches.

California proposed a bill to regulate AI and mitigate potential risks, but was eventually vetoed. In this article, I explore what was this bill trying to fix, its shortcomings and what's ahead. I also compare it with the EU AI Act at a high level, to more clearly understand how they differ, and the different rationales behind the two approaches.

China’s AI ambitions are clashing with the government’s need to control political narratives, causing a significant drag on its progress in generative AI.